ASEAN Regionalism: Towards Creating a Resilient Southeast Asian Community

ASEAN Regionalism: Towards Creating a Resilient Southeast Asian Community

Vol. IV / No. 2 | March 2023

Authors:
Raneeta Mutiara (PhD Student at Graduate Studies Program, and Associate Faculty at School of Humanities and Behavioural Sciences, Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS))

Summary
The direction of the multilateral Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) seems to shift after the subsidence of Covid-19 pandemic, particularly due to the deterioration in China-United States (US) relationship, Russia-Ukraine war and political turmoil in Myanmar. The three ongoing circumstances were among the highlights of the current ASEAN political landscape. It appears that the time has come for ASEAN to recalibrate its organisational priority, especially with regards to its geopolitical role among the big powers vis-à-vis the need to tighten security measures to protect the inviolable sovereignty and territorial integrity of its members. Nonetheless, while it is important for ASEAN to monitor the external dynamics to protect its stability, it is imperative that the existing internal complications are triaged and tackled in order to build a strong regional core insusceptible to most predicaments.

Keywords: ASEAN, Southeast Asia, regionalism, interregional cooperation, stability

ASEAN Regionalism: Towards Creating a Resilient Southeast Asian Community

Emerging Global South Carbon Trading: Conflicting Interest of Green Capitalism and Socio-Ecological Justice

Vol. IV No. 1 | March 2023

Authors:
Ahmad Hidayat (Associate at Department of International Relations, Universitas Indonesia. Policy and Diplomacy Specialist at Carbon Policy Lab, CarbonEthics Indonesia)

Summary

Carbon trading or emission trading system (ETS) has been a hot topic for climate change mitigation and adaptation in recent years; commencing within the Global North by European ETS in 2005, now moving forward to the Global South market and economies like Mexico ETS 2020, China ETS 2021, and Indonesia Energy-subsector ETS in 2023. After the Paris Agreement in 2015, the Global South changed its perspective in terms of becoming more susceptible to market mechanisms and lessening criticism/skepticism towards Global North’s intention to commercialize climate issues. It allows parties to formulate their action based on their needs and domestic capacity (Nationally Determined Contributions/NDC) to meet net zero. Green capitalism favors this approach, emphasizing on the market capacity to correct environmental externalities as firms will be keen to follow the high environmental standard while maintaining high productivity. However, Green Capitalism receives criticism from the socio-ecological justice perspective that underlines the uncontrollable nature of the capitalistic approach which tends to exploit the system’s weaknesses for profiting firms, and disregard the protection for marginalized minority, and non-human organism from exploitation. Regardless, the fast progression of global economic dynamism today  evokes people-environment-economy nexus relations and still needs further scrutinization for enhancement.

Keywords: Global South, Carbon Trading, Climate Change, Green Capitalism, Socio-Ecological Justice

ASEAN Regionalism: Towards Creating a Resilient Southeast Asian Community

Foreign Assistance, CSOs, and Counterterrorism: Avoiding Competitions and Extending the Outreach

Vol. III No. 1 | March 2022

Authors:
Chaula Rininta Anindya (PhD Student at the Graduate School of International Relations, Ritsumeikan University, Japan)

Summary

Foreign assistance has been an indispensable part of Indonesia’s counterterrorism efforts. In the aftermath of the 2002 Bali Bombings, Indonesia has been receiving foreign assistance to enhance its counterterrorism capabilities. The deadly attack in Bali sparked concerns over the fear of the growing terrorist networks in the country and the region. Almost two decades since the Bali Bombing, counterterrorism remains an unfinished problem in the country. Despite the significant contribution of foreign assistance in improving Indonesia’s counterterrorism capabilities, doubts remain over the actual implementation. This article aims to understand the role of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism (P/CVE) as a proxy of the foreign agencies in implementing their programme. It will also attempt to understand the policies of the National Counter terrorism Agency (BNPT) in coordinating relevant P/CVE agencies in Indonesia.

Keywords: Foreign Assistance, Developmental, Civil Society Organizations, Counterterrorism, Terrorism

ASEAN Regionalism: Towards Creating a Resilient Southeast Asian Community

The IEA-Indonesia Energy Transition Alliance: Towards Indonesia’s Leadership in Global Energy Governance?

Vol. II / No. 5 | April 2021

Authors:
Aji Fajri (Master student, Paris School of International Affairs, Sciences Po)

Summary

A few weeks ago, Indonesia and the International Energy Agency (IEA) have signed an agreement to establish the IEA Indonesia Energy Transition Alliance. The Alliance will be the platform for both parties to enhance collaboration in developing energy policy, mobilizing high-level political engagement, and accelerating the energy transition. But regardless of its technocratic measures, there is a more important political mission underlying the establishment of The Alliance, which is Indonesia’s aspiring leadership in global energy governance. As stated in the IEA’s press release, the Alliance will allow the IEA and Indonesia to build new partnerships and workstreams to support Indonesia’s international energy leadership (IEA, 2021). Can Indonesia be successful in carrying out this mission? The normative answer is that only the time will tell, but Indonesia certainly has the potential to be so. Ensuring that it has political and economic influence will be crucial should Indonesia aspires to a leadership role in the global energy governance.

Keywords: The Alliance, leadership, Indonesia, the International Energy Agency (IEA), energy transition, political and economic influence

ASEAN Regionalism: Towards Creating a Resilient Southeast Asian Community

Giving the Floor to the Responsible Great Power: China as the Key Player to Solve Myanmar Crisis

Vol. II / No. 4 | April 2021

Authors:
Mireille Marcia Karman, Rizky Widian
(Lecturers at the Department of International Relations, Parahyangan Catholic University)

Summary

The ongoing crisis in Myanmar has attracted various negative responses from the international community. As a fellow member of ASEAN, Indonesia has tried to solve the problem by persuading ASEAN member states and ASEAN’s partners, including the United States and China, to bring this issue to the upcoming ASEAN meeting. While seeking to maintain the ASEAN centrality, this effort is also seen as a strategy to prevent the possibility of turning the Myanmar crisis into a proxy battle between the United States and China. In this article, we offer an alternative suggestion that Indonesia should not only rely on ASEAN mechanism but also allow China to be the responsible great power by solving the crisis in Myanmar through a more involved direct diplomacy with Myanmar. In doing so, China would be the key player in maintaining the regional stability. By offering such suggestion, we believe that first, it is improbable to turn Myanmar’s issue into proxy battle between the 2 great powers since both countries have different level of interest in Myanmar. While China has a rather a lot at stake in Myanmar, United States does not partake any vital interest in or related to Myanmar. Moreover, Myanmar is not perceived as the most significant actor in the region and hence, encouraging China to play a bigger role in solving this crisis may not be seen as an immense threat to the United States’ position in the region.

Keywords: Myanmar, ASEAN, China, great power competition, regional stability

ASEAN Regionalism: Towards Creating a Resilient Southeast Asian Community

A Cartography of Overseas Indonesians: Preliminary Mapping of Diaspora Actors, Their Positionalities to the State and Implications for Protection

Vol. II No. 3 | March 2021

Authors:
Ani W. Soetjipto (Lecturer, Department of International Relations, Universitas Indonesia)
Dwi Ardhanariswari Sundrijo (Lecturer, Department of International Relations, Universitas Indonesia)
Muhammad Arif (Lecturer, Department of International Relations, Universitas Indonesia)
Arivia T. D. Yulestiana (Lecturer, Department of International Relations, Universitas Indonesia)
Annisa D. Amalia (Lecturer, Department of International Relations, Universitas Indonesia)

Summary
This commentary provides an overview of the evolution and landscape of the Indonesian diaspora, highlighting diversity of actors (in terms of demographic make-up and political inclinations) as well as acknowledging how our history of mobility has predated national history. Against the backdrop of a global trend, in which we see a proliferation of diaspora institutions, this mapping exercise contends that in the Indonesian case, contemporary diaspora engagement has been championed more by the society rather than the state. It considers the emergence of the Indonesian Diaspora Network as a diaspora organization, and the significant break it represents from previous diasporic animosity toward the state, and its evident national basis. An important reflection advanced here is how class  factors in diaspora formation and engagement, which leads to the subsequent question of inclusion/exclusion. What are the limits of diaspora membership, and what is low-wage migrant workers’ position in the diaspora? While diaspora engagement policies are mostly pre-occupied with attracting global talent (their capital, resources and network), this commentary canvasses early questions about the possibility of harnessing diaspora potentials in protecting migrant workers as one of the most vulnerable sub-population of Indonesians abroad. Protection efforts nevertheless need to take into account the workers’ own agency and organization, which have become more pronounced in recent years.

Keywords: diaspora, IDN, migrant workers, protection